Group Work in Higher Education: Benefits & Practices for Success
Collaborative learning, also known as group work, is a pedagogical approach that fosters
student interaction, shared knowledge construction, and cooperative problem-solving
(Almazovaite et al., 2024; Heilporn et al., 2021). It specifically refers to structured,
instructor-guided activities in which students share responsibilities and engage in
curriculum collectively (Medaille & Usinger, 2020). Recent research highlights its
effectiveness in enhancing cognitive development, social skills, and academic achievement.
This review examines these benefits while also discussing essential factors for designing
and implementing group work effectively in higher education.
Benefits of Collaborative Learning
- Fairness: Although group work offers numerous benefits, both faculty and students often express
concerns about the fairness of assessment and equal contribution in group assignments.
Group assignments that implement peer and self-assessment foster an increased sense
of fairness, accountability, and trust amongst group members (Ion, Díaz-Vicario, &
Mercader, 2024). While instructors can design assessments to align with their expectations
and the nature of the assignment, utilizing established assessment tools is also a
great option.
- The Peer Assessment Collaboration Evaluation (PACE) tool is a web-based tool designed
to combat social loafing in online group assignments. Based on a Likert-type scale,
PACE measures the quality of work, quality of contribution, timeliness, related knowledge,
and interaction/communication. It is freely available for integration into learning
management systems (LMSs) such as Canvas. A recent study examining the impact of the
PACE assessment on students' attitudes toward group work found that using the tool
enhanced their perception of its usefulness and ease of use while also influencing
their behavioral control and self-efficacy during the project (Havard et al., 2023).
- The Groups Advance into Teams Enabling Success (GATES) tool is an evidence-based tool
used by allied health universities to integrate core teaching principles into online
group assessment (Singleton et al., 2022). The elements evaluated through this tool
include team structure, communication, leadership, and situational monitoring/mutual
support.
- Barriers due to Language Proficiency: UNT is the home of about 9,000 international students coming from 137 countries (UNT,
n.d.). While students are required to demonstrate proof of English Proficiency to
be admitted into UNT, these students may still face barriers in language proficiency
when working with students who speak English as their first language. A qualitative
study examining international students' experiences in a business writing course,
found that asynchronous collaborative discussion board assignments enhanced their
sense of belonging during group work (Chen, 2023). The flexibility of these asynchronous
assignments allowed international students extra time to prepare their contributions,
increasing their confidence in their ability to participate actively in group work.
- Introversion: Every student is unique, leading to a wide range of introverted and extroverted tendencies
among students that may surface during group work. A recent study examined the experiences
of third- and fourth-year college students that self-identify as quiet students. These
students reported they were often uncomfortable in group learning environments due
to a perceived pressure to demonstrate their learning (Medaille & Usinger, 2020).
This discomfort often resulted in a lack of engagement in the activity, and in some
cases even brought on behaviors aimed at avoiding the situation entirely. When asked
what contributed to these students' silence during small group discussions, their
answers pointed to the fact that there was often little time to get comfortable with
their peers before being asked to collectively engage with the material. Allowing
time for relationship building activities in collaborative learning may serve to mitigate
this challenge, giving the group members an opportunity to establish trust and productive
communication patterns.
Application
Are you interested in using collaborative learning in your classroom but unsure of
where to start? A recent study tracked the use of collaborative learning in both undergraduate
and graduate courses offered in an online, hybrid and in person setting. This study
found that collaborative learning techniques listed below helped students across multiple
teaching modalities master student learning outcomes (Kuwabara et al., 2020).
- Affinity Grouping: Have students reflect on a topic individually, group them by similar ideas, and then
have them work together in small groups to explore and share their insights with the
class.
- Jeopardy Reviews: Students work in teams to answer questions about course material, promoting teamwork
and reinforcing learning in an interactive, game-like format.
- Jigsaw: Divide a topic into sections, assigning each student a section to master, then have
them come together in small groups to share and discuss what they've learned.
- Learning Cell: Have students pair up to share what they've learned and ask each other questions
to reinforce their understanding.
- Note Taking Groups: Have students work together to compare and discuss their notes to deepen understanding
and fill in gaps in their knowledge through collaboration.
- Peer Editing: Have students review and provide feedback on each other's work to improve it through
constructive criticism and help the grader apply what they have learned by evaluating
their peers' work.
- Round Robin: Have students in small groups take turns sharing their ideas or answers to a question,
rotating around the group until everyone has contributed.
- Round Table Discussions: Have students sit in small groups and take turns sharing ideas or answers, creating
a flexible, open discussion without a set speaking order.
- Team Matrix: Have students work in small groups to complete tasks by dividing responsibilities
based on their strengths, encouraging teamwork and accountability.
- Test Taking Groups: Have students work in groups to discuss and answer test questions, promoting creative
problem solving and group learning.
- Think-Pair-Share: Have students think about a question individually, pair up to discuss their thoughts,
and then share their ideas with the class.
Through incorporating collaborative learning into their coursework, faculty can enhance
student engagement, teamwork, and academic success in their class. While effective,
factors such as fair assessment, language inclusivity, and student social dynamics
should be considered when designing collaborative assignments. When thoughtfully designed,
collaborative learning creates an interactive and enriching educational experience
for students.
References
Almazovaite, M., Cohn, E. P., & Kumar, S. (2024). Group projects as spaces for leadership
development in the liberal arts classroom: A case of american undergraduate students.
Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education, , 9 1480929. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1480929.
Cheang, M., & Yamashita, G. L. (2023). Employers’ expectations of university graduates
as they transition into the workplace. Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/ejed-2023-0013
Chen, X. (2023). Online collaboration tools and international students' sense of belonging
in group work. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 12, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v12i1.36325
Havard, B., Podsiad, M., & Valaitis, K. (2023). Peer assessment collaboration evaluation:
An innovative assessment tool for online learning environments. TechTrends, 67(2), 331–341. https://doi-org.libproxy.library.unt.edu/10.1007/s11528-022-00832-8
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies
to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Ion, G., Anna Díaz-Vicario, & Mercader, C. (2024). Making steps towards improved fairness
in group work assessment: The role of students’ self- and peer-assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 25(3), 425–437. https://doi.org.libproxy.library.unt.edu/10.1177/14697874231154826
Kuwabara, M., Einbinder, S. D., Sun, R., & Azizi, R. (2020). Collaborative learning
techniques, student learning outcomes, and equal workload within groups in different
teaching modalities. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(2), 293–304. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1286478.pdf
Medaille, A., & Usinger, J. (2020a). “That’s going to be the hardest thing for me”:
Tensions experienced by quiet students during collaborative learning situations. Educational Studies, 46(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1555456
Mertz, P. S., Sherrer, S. M., & Bowers, G. M. (2022). Teaching collaboration skills
to undergraduate biochemistry and chemistry students. The FASEB Journal, 36. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R1949
Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2021). Beyond grades: Improving college students’ social-cognitive
outcomes in STEM through a collaborative learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 24(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09325-y
Singleton, J. A., Watson, K. E., & Kenyon, J. J. (2022). GATES: An online step-wise
tool to develop student collaborative teamwork competencies. Innovative Higher Education, 47(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09569-3