Exceptions & Defenses to Copyright Infringement
Last Updated: 06/14/2021 13:23
Three Exceptions
You generally need to obtain a license (i.e., explicit written permission) to use
a third party's copyrighted material. There are three major exceptions to this rule:
(1) the face-to-face instruction exception, (2) the online instruction exception (also
known as the TEACH Act), and (3) the fair use exception. These exceptions are defenses
against a claim of copyright infringement. Exceptions act like an umbrella, under
which your use of the copyrighted work is protected. In other words, you will be
able to use the copyrighted material without the owner or licensor's permission, but only under certain circumstances.
Before considering reliance upon any of these defenses, we recommend first considering
the following safe alternatives:
- Public Domain / Open Access - Is your asset in the public domain or is it made available via open licensing terms?
Creative works which were first published prior to 1924 are usually considered part
of the public domain and are free to use.
- Licensing - Have you inquired to see if the UNT Libraries have a license to the asset, or have you attempted to purchase a copy of the work
or a license for its use on your own?
- Alternatives - Have you explored our Usable Works page to search some of the web sites listed there (like Pixabay.com) for comparable assets that are unrestricted in their use?
Once you have fully exhausted all the above options, then the next step is to explore
the first two exceptions. These are listed below. Only as a last resort should the
fair use exception be relied upon. Fair use is detailed last on this web page.
If you have any questions about any of the following please reach out to the CLEAR compliance team here.
Face-to-Face Instruction Exception
Copyright law1 permits the performance or display of legally licensed/purchased works, for strictly
and directly pedagogical purposes relevant to the course, in face-to-face classes
at nonprofit, accredited schools. Such works include the showing of a film, playing
music, performing a play, projecting images, and other types of performances and displays
of copyrighted works in the classroom, as long as the work was lawfully acquired.
TEACH Act - Online/Distance Instruction Exception
The "TEACH Act,"2 permits uses of copyrighted works in online classes, but only under certain circumstances.
To determine if your intended use would qualify, please refer to the TEACH Act Compliance Checklist (PDF).
One of the requirements of the TEACH Act is the inclusion of a copyright statement
in your course which is available to all your students. To meet this need we have an example copyright statement. We recommend its inclusion in every online course.
Fair Use Exception
When a proposed use of a third-party copyrighted work is not permitted by license
and does not fall within one of the specific exceptions (e.g., works in the public
domain), use may still be permitted under the fair use doctrine. At the University
of North Texas, instructors are responsible for making their own fair use examinations
when choosing the amount of materials to use in their courses.
Why does UNT take this approach?
- These best practices support instructors' academic freedom in the development of course
materials.
- Instructors are best informed and situated about how important elements of the fair
use analysis apply to their specific uses of third-party copyrighted material. This
includes the amount of the material used, its centrality to the original work, and
the potential market for the work.
Some instructors may find the idea of making a fair use evaluation intimidating or
frustrating. Please rest assured that you can learn the basics of fair use, and we
are here to support you every step of the way!
The Fair Use Factors
- The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational
purposes.
- Nonprofit educational uses, including using a copyrighted work for scholarly criticism
or commentary, making copies for face-to-face classroom use, repurposing a copyrighted
work for class material, will tip the balance in favor of fair use.
- The more the purpose and character of your use differs from the original nature of
the copyrighted work, such as creating a parody, using the work in a new way to fit
class material…etc., the more this factor will tend to favor fair use.
- Digitization of works to provide access to the print disabled, to enable indexing,
and to enable ‘non-consumptive research’ (e.g. text mining) will likely tip the balance
in favor of fair use.
- Use of copyrighted works for direct pedagogical purposes strengthens a fair use argument.
- Use of copyrighted works, such as images or video, for decoration in an online course
with no transformative purpose will likely undermine a fair use argument.
- The nature of the copyrighted work.
- Use of a published work is more likely to be considered fair than use of an unpublished
work.
- Use of factual or non-fiction-based work tends to tip the balance in favor of fair
use, whereas the use of highly creative work (such as art, music, novels, and films)
tends to tip the balance against fair use.
- The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole.
- Minimal copying of small amounts of larger works, such as a few pages from a book,
will favor fair use when they are truly excerpts and do not serve as replacements
for the original works.
- Lower percentages of an excerpt copied (e.g., under 10%) favor fair use. In other
words, the smaller the amount, the better!
- BUT copying of a quantitatively small portion of a work can weigh against fair use if
the portion used is the “heart of” the work. For example, if you copy pages from a
book which contain content so important as to nullify anyone’s need to buy the book,
this would weaken fair use (note that this affects Factor Four below). If the portion
used is not central or significant to the entire work, it will likely favor fair use.
- The extent of permissible copying under fair use varies with the purpose and character
of the use. For example, a transformative use of a whole work, i.e. parody or scholarly
criticism, might weigh in favor of fair use if the amount is appropriate for the purpose.
- Copying an entire work may be permissible, if necessary, to make the work accessible
to people with disabilities.
- Please note:
- Use of unlicensed commercial ‘stock’ images in a course is discouraged. Commercial
‘stock’ images are photographs or illustrations that are being sold through a vendor
web site, such as Getty Images, iStock, Adobe Stock, and the like. Learn where to find images that are free to use, and how to check any images you aren’t sure about.
- Copying of journal articles, in their entirety, into an online course may violate
the licensing terms which govern the UNT Libraries’ subscriptions to online journals
and databases. A great alternative is linking out directly to the article in the
UNT Libraries’ electronic resources. Your subject librarian can assist you with this process!
- The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
- The first three factors affect the analysis of this factor. For example, if the proposed
use is for educational purpose and the amount used is appropriate, the use may likely
not have a significant effect on the market or value of the work.
- If the use is transformative and the amount of use is small, the fourth factor will
tip in favor of fair use.
- Courts will look at whether the use would damage or negate the potential market for
the original work. With respect to impact on potential licensing revenue, courts look
at “traditional, reasonable, or likely to be developed markets.” If the use would
significantly impair a market or potential market, it will undermine a fair use argument.
- Some courts consider whether licensing of content is easily accessible, reasonably
priced, and available for the portion and format we seek to use. If a license is readily
available for the portion of the use, it may undermine a fair use argument.
Attribution
Generally, attributing a work to the rightful owner is recommended as a matter of
academic ethics, and doing so demonstrates our good faith. In some cases, attribution
may be required by the terms of a Creative Commons license. Learn more about Open Access Creative Commons licenses, and how to attribute Creative
Commons works.
When Fair Use Does Not Apply
When a proposed use of copyright material does not fall within the fair use doctrine
or another copyright exception, then written permission, such as a license agreement,
from the copyright owner is required to engage in use.
_____
1 - 17 U.S.C. § 110(1).
2 - 17 U.S.C. § 110(2).